went to go see the davinci code today. what’s amazing is that i went in with fairly low expectations and guess what. it was worse than i thought. the book was good, i enjoyed it immensely and blew through it in one afternoon but the movie…gag.
what sucked about it? tom hanks. their reveal of ian mckellan’s character’s duplicity. what else sucked about it? how do you show on film, somebody’s puzzle solving mental processes. well the way Ron Howard chose to do it was to film Hanks’ eyeballs going back and forth. ooooohhh, what exposition. sheesh. the only good thing? audrey tatou. she’s such a cutie. loved her in amelie and she holds her own here.
but the movie itself…i mean the whole fun of the book for me was trying to solve the puzzles. you can’t do that in film. it doesn’t work. it ends up being a jumbled mess. i knew what the story was and what the puzzles were so i should have had a firm grasp of what’s going on right? well the movie was so messed up i got confused watching it. bah.
i think i’m going to have to cleanse my palate and go watch District B-13. now that looks like some good fun.









